Students Rights
Clark believes that students possess certain rights along with their responsibilities. These rights value both the individual and the community and provide for student support and protection. At the same time, for students to exercise these rights, they must act responsibly, in accordance with University policies and procedures — including the Student Code of Conduct — and with local, state, and federal law.
- Clark University students have the right to an environment in which the University takes reasonable measures to offer students protection from foreseeable danger.
- Clark University students have the right to an environment conducive to the pursuit of academic requirements and interests.
- Clark University students have the right not to be unlawfully discriminated against by any agent, organization, or member of the Clark University community for reasons of age; creed; (dis)ability; ethnic or national origin; gender, gender identity, or gender expression; marital status; political or social affiliation; race; religion; or sexual orientation.
- Clark University students have the right to express their ideas, thoughts, and opinions, both individually and in the manner of a forum or protest (read the Protests and Demonstrations Policy), without fear of censure or retribution from members of the Clark University community.
- Clark University students have the right to a reasonable expectation of privacy in their academic, cocurricular, and personal lives.
- Clark University students have the right to access and control access to their educational records as provided in the Federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, also known as FERPA.
- Clark University students have the right to bring forward a complaint if one has a good-faith reason to believe that it is more likely than not that the rights or responsibilities derived from this document have been violated.
- Clark University students have the right to address all alleged violations of the University’s policies and procedures. The University’s conduct process follows procedures as defined in the Student Code of Conduct.
Use of the student code of Conduct
The Student Conduct Officer shall have the discretion to determine the appropriate response and resolution methods, if any (e.g., Community Standards, mediation, formal charges). Determinations will be based on the unique features of the matter.
Referral to and Cooperation with Law Enforcement
The University may refer violations of law to appropriate law enforcement agencies. Such referral does not preclude University action for the same violations. The conduct process does not determine violation(s) of law. The conduct process is an administrative process that seeks to hold students accountable to minimum behavioral expectations related to the Student Code of Conduct.
Student Groups and Organizations
Student groups and organizations may face violations of this Code.
A student group or organization and its officers may be held collectively and individually responsible for violations of the Student Code of Conduct. These violations may have been committed by those associated with the group or organization if the member(s) received the consent or encouragement of the group or organization or the leaders or officers of the group or organization. The finding of responsibility may occur if the group or organization knew or
should have known about the behavior and failed to make reasonable efforts to prevent it.
The officers or leaders or any identifiable spokesperson for a student group or organization may be directed by the Student Conduct Officer to take appropriate action designed to prevent or end violations of the Student Code of Conduct by the group or organization or to educate the group or organization. Failure to make reasonable efforts to comply with the Student Conduct Officer’s directive shall be considered a violation of the Student Code of Conduct by the officers, leaders, or spokesperson for the group or organization and by the group or organization itself.
The officers or leaders of a student group or organization in violation of the Student Code of Conduct will be subject to an alternative resolution, peer conduct meeting, an administrative hearing, or University Conduct Board hearing.
Sanctions for group or organization misconduct may include revocation or denial of University recognition, as well as other appropriate sanctions pursuant to the sanctions outlined in the Student Code of Conduct.
Restorative Practice
Restorative practice at Clark University encompasses a comprehensive approach to addressing student violations of university policies. The primary objective is to foster an environment where students comprehend the consequences of their actions and recognize the broader impact on the university community. This approach aligns with Clark University’s commitment to upholding the fundamental rights of its students, considering any actions that impede these rights as violations of the student code of conduct.
In instances where serious violations occur, the restorative practice employed by Clark University involves posing restorative questions and using restorative practice principles. These questions prompt reflection and understanding, making the disciplinary process educational rather than punitive. Even in cases where severe consequences may be warranted, the emphasis remains on guiding students toward recognizing the implications of their actions and learning from their mistakes.
The overarching goal of restorative practice at Clark University is to instill a sense of responsibility and accountability in students. By engaging in this process, the university aims to empower students to take ownership of their actions, comprehend the significance of respecting others’ rights, and ultimately prevent the recurrence of similar transgressions in the future. In essence, restorative practice serves as a means to address disciplinary issues and contribute to the student body’s overall educational and personal development.
For more information on Restorative PracticeDefinition of Terms
Advisor refers to designated staff members who are appointed by the Vice President for Student Affairs and who are available to students to assist them through the conduct process. Advisors are trained by Student Conduct and Community Standards staff in the conduct process, but they function as independent advisors for students. Advisors may confer with their advisee but may not actively participate in the conduct process by offering information on behalf of the student.
Affirmative Consent is a knowing, voluntary, and mutual decision among all participants to engage in sexual activity. Consent can be given by words or actions if those words or actions create clear permission regarding willingness to engage in sexual activity. Silence or lack of resistance, in and of itself, does not demonstrate consent. The definition of consent does not vary based upon a participant’s sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
The following six (6) principles, along with the above definition, will be used to evaluate whether affirmative consent was given:
Advisor
Designated staff and faculty members who are appointed by the Dean of Students or their designee to assist students through the conduct process. Advisors are trained by Student Conduct and Community Standards staff in the conduct process, but they function as independent advisors for students. Advisors may confer with their advisees but may not actively participate in the conduct process by offering information on behalf of the student.
Affirmative Consent
A knowing, voluntary, and mutual decision among all participants to engage in sexual activity. Consent can be given by words or actions if those words or actions create clear permission regarding willingness to engage in sexual activity. Silence or lack of resistance, in and of itself, does not demonstrate consent. The definition of consent does not vary based upon a participant’s sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
The following six principles, along with the above definition, will be used to evaluate whether affirmative consent was given.
- Consent to any sexual act or prior consensual sexual activity between or with any party does not necessarily constitute consent to any other sexual act.
- Consent is required regardless of whether the person initiating the act is under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol.
- Consent may be initially given but withdrawn at any time.
- Consent cannot be given when a person is incapacitated, which occurs when an individual lacks the ability to knowingly choose to participate in sexual activity. Incapacitation may be caused by the lack of consciousness or being asleep, being involuntarily restrained, or if an individual otherwise cannot consent. Depending on the degree of intoxication, someone who is under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicants may be incapacitated and therefore unable to consent.
- Consent cannot be given when it is the result of any coercion, intimidation, force, or threat of harm.
- When consent is withdrawn or can no longer be given, sexual activity must stop.
Bias Incident
Any conduct or communication motivated by hatred or prejudice that demeans, degrades, or harasses an individual or group based upon membership in a protected category as recognized by law or Clark University policy, including race, color, national or ethnic origin, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, genetics, physical or mental disability, and veteran or other protected status. Examples include targeting a group or individual, in person or electronically, with hateful conduct that interferes with a person’s educational experience or employment, as well as acts of vandalism or graffiti. A bias incident may or may not involve violations of University policies or state or federal law.
Bias Incident Response Team
A team of administrators and faculty committed to proactively responding to bias incidents.
Business days
Days that University offices are open for business (excluding weekends). Class days and business days may not correspond.
Confidentiality
This may only be offered by some individuals — specifically those who are not required by law to report known incidents of sexual assault or other crimes to University officials, in a manner consistent with state and federal law, including but not limited to 20 U.S.C. 1092 and 20 U.S.C. 1681. Licensed mental health counselors, medical providers, and pastoral counselors are examples of University employees who may offer confidentiality.
Direct Threat
A communication, from at least one identified individual to another identified individual, that creates or implies a significant risk of substantial harm to the health or safety of another person.
Distribution
Any form of sale, exchange, or transfer, regardless of whether money was involved.
Group
People associated with each other but who have not complied with University requirements for recognition as an organization.
Hate Crime
As defined by Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 22C, Section 32, “any criminal act coupled with overt actions motivated by bigotry and bias including, but not limited to, a threatened, attempted, or completed overt act motivated at least in part by racial, religious, ethnic, handicap, gender, or sexual orientation prejudice, or which otherwise deprives another person of his constitutional rights by threats, intimidation, or coercion, or which seeks to interfere with or disrupt a person’s exercise of constitutional rights through harassment or intimidation.” For purposes of this protocol, all hate crimes are considered a form of bias incident.
Chapter 265 Crimes Against the Person – Section 39 states in relevant part that it is illegal to commit a crime against one’s person or property with the intent to intimidate such person because of such person’s race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, or disability.
Hearing
A formal process conducted by the University Hearing Board or other appropriate hearing officer or body. This formal process is designed to gather and consider relevant information regarding a possible violation of the Student Code of Conduct and to determine sanction(s), if appropriate.
Target Person(s)
Individuals or groups who believe or perceive that they have been the victim of a bias incident and/or hate crime. Any individual or group can be targeted.
University Official
Any faculty, full-time employee, part-time employee, or student employee authorized to issue directions in a given situation.
Weapon
Any object or substance designed to wound, cause injury, or incapacitate persons or animals or damage property, including, but not limited to, firearms, ammunition, explosives, other lethal weapons, and chemicals such as Mace and tear gas. Within the provisions of Massachusetts G.L. c. 140, § 131M: Unlawful Possession of an Assault Weapon or Large Capacity Feeding Device, firearms and other dangerous weapons include, without limitation, ability club, blackjack or bludgeon, cane/sword, chukka stick, pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun, switchblade knife, gravity knife, pilum ballistic knife, metal knuckle knife, electronic dart gun, Kung Fu star, electronic stun gun, metal knuckles, sandbag, sand club, wrist-brace type slingshot or slingshot, dagger, dangerous knife, imitation pistol, or any other instrument or weapon. Also included are air guns, spring guns, or any other instrument or weapon in which the propelling force is a spring, air, piston, or carbon dioxide cartridge. A harmless instrument designed to look like a firearm, explosive, or other weapon is expressly included within the meaning of weapon.
Office of Community Standards
Alumni and Student Engagement Center
2nd Floor
950 Main Street
Worcester MA 01610